Tampa Bay Pirates
(2 - 0)
1st, Blue South
Lv. 0
+0
+0
+0
Overall
82
Offense
83
Defense
80
Roster
60 / 60
1
0 - 14
(1-1)
SUN
1:00PM
2
20 - 23
(1-1)
THU
8:25PM
3
(1-1)
THU
8:25PM
4
(0-2)
THU
8:25PM
5
@
(1-1)
THU
8:25PM
6
(0-2)
SUN
1:00PM
7
(0-2)
THU
8:25PM
8
@
(1-1)
THU
8:25PM
9
@
(2-0)
THU
8:25PM
10
@
(0-2)
THU
8:25PM
11
(0-2)
THU
8:25PM
12
(1-1)
THU
1:00PM
13
@
(1-1)
THU
8:25PM
14
@
(0-2)
THU
8:25PM
15
@
(1-1)
THU
8:25PM
16
(1-1)
SAT
1:00PM
17
@
(1-1)
SUN
1:00PM
18
WC
19
DIV
20
CC
21
Riley David
P #92 6'4" 221 lbs
strength
speed
agility
jumping
mental
stamina
catching
break_tackles
carrying
run_defense
pass_rushing
pass_coverage
run_blocking
pass_blocking
throwing_power
throwing_accuracy
kicking_power
kicking_accuracy
College_Team
College_Region
Raw OVR
| Player Name | Team | POS |
Depth Rank |
OVR | CON | Age |
Yrs Pro |
HT | WT | PC | CUL | CHM | HAP | CB | D | SAL N.GTD /YR ($M) |
SAL GTD /YR ($M) |
SAL TOT /YR ($M) |
Ct. Yrs Rem. |
ACT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 92 Riley David |
|
P | 1 |
|
B (-7) | 32 | 9 | 6'4" | 221 |
|
$1.2 | $0.9 (43%) | $2.1 | 4 / 4 |
Contract
| Season 1 | Season 2 | Season 3 | Season 4 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salary (Non-GTD) | $1.2M | $1.2M | $1.2M | $1.2M | $4.8M |
| Salary (GTD) (43%) | $0.9M | $0.9M | $0.9M | $0.9M | $3.6M |
| Total | $2.1M | $2.1M | $2.1M | $2.1M | $8.4M |
Attributes
| Raw OVR | Strength | Speed | Agility | Jumping | Mental | Stamina | Catching | Break tackles |
Carrying | Run defense |
Pass rushing |
Pass coverage |
Run blocking |
Pass blocking |
Throwing power |
Throwing accuracy |
Kicking power |
Kicking accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88 | 58 | 74 | 72 | 18 | 67 | 81 | 40 | 36 | 52 | 36 | 14 | 15 | 23 | 14 | 45 | 35 | 96 | 81 |
Season Stats
| Season | Team | GP | LNG | ATT | IN20 | W | L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 71 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | |
| Career Total | 2 | 71 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
Player History
None