Chicago Berserkers
(4 - 2)
Lv. 67
+19
+18
+3
Overall
87
Offense
88
Defense
88
Roster
62 / 62
1
(2-4)
SUN
1:00PM
2
(2-3)
THU
8:25PM
3
(0-6)
THU
8:25PM
4
(4-2)
SUN
1:00PM
5
(4-2)
THU
8:25PM
6
(4-2)
SUN
1:00PM
7
(2-4)
THU
8:25PM
8
(4-2)
SUN
1:00PM
9
(5-0)
THU
8:25PM
10
(0-6)
THU
8:25PM
11
(4-2)
THU
1:00PM
12
(4-2)
THU
8:25PM
13
(3-3)
THU
8:25PM
14
(4-2)
THU
8:25PM
15
(4-2)
THU
8:25PM
16
(1-5)
THU
8:25PM
17
(2-3)
SUN
1:00PM
18
WC
19
DIV
20
CC
21
Nate Latham
DT #60 6'3" 297 lbs
strength
speed
agility
jumping
mental
stamina
catching
break_tackles
carrying
run_defense
pass_rushing
pass_coverage
run_blocking
pass_blocking
throwing_power
throwing_accuracy
kicking_power
kicking_accuracy
College_Team
College_Region
Raw OVR
| Player Name | Team | POS |
Depth Rank |
OVR | CON | Age |
Yrs Pro |
HT | WT | PC | CUL | CHM | HAP | CB | D | SAL ($M) |
SAL Yrs Rem. |
Total Contract Value |
ACT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 Nate Latham |
|
DT | 2 |
|
C (-8) | 26 | 4 | 6'3" | 297 |
|
+2 | $4.1 | 3 / 3 | $12.3M |
Attributes
| Raw OVR | Strength | Speed | Agility | Jumping | Mental | Stamina | Catching | Break tackles |
Carrying | Run defense |
Pass rushing |
Pass coverage |
Run blocking |
Pass blocking |
Throwing power |
Throwing accuracy |
Kicking power |
Kicking accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81 | 97 | 79 | 82 | 78 | 68 | 88 | 40 | 48 | 30 | 76 | 81 | 43 | 52 | 31 | 31 | 53 | 49 | 45 |
Combine Results
40-yard Dash
4.59
4.59
Bench Reps
37
37
Broad Jump
10'11"
10'11"
Vertical Jump
33.5"
33.5"
3-Cone Drill
7.51
7.51
20-yd Shuttle
4.63
4.63
60-yd Shuttle
11.68
11.68
Wonderlic
14
14
Scouting Reports
Season 28
| # | Player | College | Region | POS | Age | CUL | Scout | Date | Evaluation | Confidence | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 Nate Latham | Great Plains | DT | 26 | Media | S23 W2 | 67 ±5 | 50% | View Report |
Season Stats
| Season | Team | Yards | Td | Tackles | Sacks | Interceptions | Fumbles Forced | Safeties | Wins | Losses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 62 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 12 | |
| 27 | 5 | 0 | 49 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 5 | |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
Player History
| Player Name | Team | POS | Note | Change | Age | Updated During |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 Nate Latham |
|
DT | Upgraded +1 CON | -9 -8 CON | 25 | Season 27, Week 31 |
| 60 Nate Latham |
|
DT | Regressed -3 raw OVR (PC 54%) | 84 81 OVR | 25 | Season 27, Week 31 |
| 60 Nate Latham |
|
DT | Re-signed for 3yrs @ $4.1M/yr | 86 OVR | 25 | Season 27, Week 26 |
| 60 Nate Latham |
|
DT | HAP from -1 to 0 (made playoffs) | -1 0 | 25 | Season 27, Week 17 |
| 60 Nate Latham |
|
DT | Progressed +1 raw OVR (PC 57%) | 83 84 OVR | 24 | Season 26, Week 31 |
| 60 Nate Latham |
|
DT | HAP from 0 to -1 (didn't make playoffs) | 0 -1 | 24 | Season 26, Week 17 |
| 60 Nate Latham |
|
DT | Upgraded +1 CON | -10 -9 CON | 24 | Season 26, Week 15 |
| 60 Nate Latham |
|
DT | Progressed +6 raw OVR (PC 60%) | 77 83 OVR | 23 | Season 25, Week 31 |
| 60 Nate Latham |
|
DT | HAP from 1 to 0 (didn't make playoffs) | 1 0 | 23 | Season 25, Week 17 |
| 60 Nate Latham |
|
DT | Progressed +2 raw OVR (PC 67%) | 75 77 OVR | 22 | Season 24, Week 31 |
| 60 Nate Latham |
|
DT | HAP from 2 to 1 (didn't make playoffs) | 2 1 | 22 | Season 24, Week 17 |
| 60 Nate Latham |
|
DT | Raw OVR revealed to be 75 | 75 OVR | 22 | Season 24, Week 4 |
| 60 Nate Latham |
|
DT | Signed rookie contract for 4yrs @ $1.3M/yr | 70 OVR | 22 | Season 23, Week 30 |
| 60 Nate Latham |
|
DT | Changed number from 90 to 60 | 90 60 | 22 | Season 23, Week 29 |
| 60 Nate Latham |
|
DT | Drafted (R6,P172) | 68 OVR | 22 | Season 23, Week 29 |
Progression Football is created, updated, and paid for by one person.
If you enjoy this free game, please consider Donating via PayPal,
or buying some cool stuff at the Store to help pay for server hosting costs to keep the game running!
Thank you!
